⚡ Draft accurately with TrueRatio™
·
Now native on Claude Gemini Cursor

Supercharge your AI with Verified Judicial Truth.

Draft petitions, counter-affidavits, and written submissions with zero hallucination. Every holding is extracted verbatim from the certified court record and locked to its official paragraph coordinates via TrueRatio™. Bench hierarchy audited automatically under Article 141.

Paste any citation: (2014) 2 SCC 1 · AIR 2014 SC 187 · 2013 INSC 768
Popular Rulings:
43,572 judgments · Verified Actual Court Orders Side-by-Side · INSC ⇄ SCC ⇄ AIR ⇄ SCR cross-mapped · Direct PDF Download Use it in Claude or Cursor (MCP) →

Courtroom-Certain Research & Intelligence

Engineered for high-stakes practice: every extracted sentence is anchored to its official paragraph number, cross-mapped across all five legal reporters, and streamable directly into Claude and Cursor with zero hallucination.

Zero-Hallucination Ratio

Verbatim Paragraph Anchors

The Problem: Generic AI tools and commercial headnotes summarize, paraphrase, or invent text.
The Mechanism: INSC.ONE quotes operative holdings word-for-word from the official e-SCR court record, locked to paragraph numbers.
Courtroom Proof: When you read the holding to the Bench, the words match the official judicial record verbatim.

Generic LLM
Summarized holding with invented quotes; unverified paragraph references.
insc.one Verbatim
Direct quote anchored to Paras [111–120]; 100% verbatim match against the official record.
Structural Reader

In-Margin 4-Colour Gutter

Supreme Court judgments average 40+ pages. Our structural margin separates binding law from procedural history at a glance, eliminating hours of manual highlighting.

Ratio Decidendi: Operative binding holding
Obiter Dicta: Judicial observations & discussions
Arguments: Senior Advocate rival submissions
Facts & History: Trial and High Court chronology
Bench Overrule Alert™

Article 141 Bench Citator

The Problem: Citing a favourable 2-judge precedent that was silently superseded by a 5-judge Constitution Bench.
The Mechanism: The Article 141 engine checks bench strength under the Dawoodi Bohra doctrine.
Courtroom Proof: Automatic red alerts flag coordinate bench splits and superior bench overrulings before you file.

9-Judge ➔ 7-Judge ➔ 5-Judge ➔ 3-Judge ➔ 2-Judge
Automatic alert on coordinate bench splits & per incuriam rulings
Cross-Reporter Crosswalk

Universal Citation Converter

Resolve any citation format in seconds. Paste an SCC, AIR, SCR, or Manupatra reference and get the official Supreme Court Neutral Citation cross-referenced with all parallel reports.

2013 INSC 768 (Official Neutral)
⇄ (2014) 2 SCC 1 · AIR 2014 SC 187
⇄ 2014 1 SCR 1 · MANU/SC/1166/2013
Claude & Cursor Connector

Native Model Context Protocol

Zero editorial lag. Connect your drafting agents directly to 43,572 judgments via a single streamable HTTP endpoint. Your agent verifies, extracts, and cites without leaving your IDE.

Endpoint: https://insc.one/mcp
6 Courtroom-grade tools: resolve_citation, get_ratio, check_overruling, bsa_concordance, get_headnotes, omni_search
First in Indian Legal Tech

Side-by-Side Actual Court Order

For the first time in Indian legal research, inspect the verified official judgment and actual order directly side-by-side with your citation extract. Read both concurrently, verify paragraph seals against the official e-SCR copy, and download the full official document with a single click.

Direct e-SCR Document Integration:
Direct e-SCR official court PDF viewer · Side-by-side dual pane · Verbatim paragraph inspection · Unmetered chamber access
The Definitive Value Addition

Your AI Before vs. After Connecting INSC.ONE MCP

See why generic drafting in Claude, Gemini, or ChatGPT creates lethal court liabilities — and how INSC.ONE transforms your model into a courtroom-winning research weapon backed by cryptographic INSCPrint™ seals.

WITHOUT MCP · RAW GENERIC AI
HIGH COURTROOM RISK
PROMPT: "Draft proposition on mandatory FIR registration under Section 154 CrPC with Constitution Bench precedent."
⚠️ Probabilistic Hallucination:
"In Ramesh Kumar v. State of Haryana (2012) 4 SCC 342, the Supreme Court held that preliminary inquiry is mandatory before FIR registration in all complaints..."
❌ FAKE CITATION: Case does not exist at that volume.
❌ CONTRARY LAW: Inverts the binding Constitution Bench ratio.
❌ COURT LIABILITY: Violates Supreme Court's Pooja Ramesh Singh ruling (Professional Misconduct).
🚫 Zero Paragraph Grounding · No Proof Document
WITH INSC.ONE MCP · COURT-PROOF
0.00% HALLUCINATION
TOOL TRIGGER: resolve_citation("Lalita Kumari") → get_ratio("2013 INSC 768")
✓ Extractive TrueRatio™ Holding:
"Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code, if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation."
✓ VERBATIM QUOTE: Paragraph 120.1 locked to official e-SCR record.
✓ ARTICLE 141 CHECK: 5-Judge Constitution Bench (Binding on all benches).
✓ TIME MACHINE: Cross-walked to Section 173 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).
🖶 INSCPrint™ Ready: SHA-256 e8f3...a9b Section 63 BSA Verified ➔
🛡️
1. Zero Professional Misconduct Risk

Every quote matches the certified signed court copy. No phantom citations, no disciplinary bench scrutiny.

⚖️
2. Article 141 Bench Protection

Your agent automatically audits bench strength, ensuring you never inadvertently cite an overturned division bench.

🖶
3. INSCPrint™ Courtroom Admissibility

Instantly back up your AI draft with a cryptographic SHA-256 sealed bench copy admissible under Section 63 BSA.

claude-desktop · mcp://insc.one · drafting brief LIVE PRECEDENT STREAM
00:04 / 00:12
Step 1: Agent calls get_ratio('2013 INSC 768')

Why Counsel Are Migrating to INSC.ONE

A direct, side-by-side comparison of workflow capabilities against legacy tools.

Capability / Feature insc.one SCC Online Indian Kanoon
Verified Actual Court Order / Judgment Side-by-Side + Direct Download ✓ Yes (First in India: In-page side-by-side reader + direct official PDF download) ✕ Proprietary reprint viewer only (no official e-SCR court order side-by-side) ✕ Plain raw text only (no official order PDF)
Verbatim, Paragraph-Anchored Headnotes ✓ Yes (Verbatim quoted & linked) ✓ Editorial summaries (editorial delay) ✕ Raw text only
In-Margin Colour-Coded Margins (Ratio vs Obiter) ✓ Yes (Instant 4-layer filter) ✕ Monochrome text ✕ No annotations
Article 141 Bench-Strength Hierarchy ✓ Automated bench-strength flags ✕ Manual cross-check ✕ None
Statute Concordance (CrPC ⇄ BNSS) ✓ Automatic section mapping ✕ Separate reference tables ✕ None
Universal Citation Converter (INSC ⇄ SCC ⇄ AIR ⇄ SCR) ✓ Full open translation ✕ Proprietary citation focus ✕ Partial text match
Pre-Filing Citation & Overruling Check ✓ Flags overruled precedents ✕ Manual citator check ✕ None
Print & Electronic Record Authenticity ✓ INSCPrint™ — SHA-256 seal (Section 63 BSA compliance) ✕ Watermark only ✕ Raw text print
Annual Investment & Access ₹49,999/yr to ₹2,99,999/yr (+GST) · Institutional Practice Plans ₹24,000 to ₹45,000+ per user/yr with strict single-device lockouts Ad-supported / Raw public text only

Institutional Legal Intelligence. Built for Serious Practice.

Courtroom certainty engineered for senior counsel, litigation teams, and law firms. Annual licenses start from ₹49,999/- +GST per year for independent counsel to ₹2,99,999/- +GST for enterprise law firms. Custom multi-seat quotations and dedicated pre-filing briefing support available upon inquiry.

Print Authenticity

INSCPrint™ — the print you hand to the Bench, authenticated.

Every digest and compilation carries a SHA-256 authenticated extract with a Scan-to-Verify record, admissible under Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 — running every-page footer, "Printed For" auto-filled from your sign-in. Where incumbent suites stamp an edition watermark, the INSCPrint™ extract is the exhibit record — not a notice.

INSCPrint™
SHA-256 authenticated extract · Scan-to-Verify · Section 63 BSA admissibility · running every-page footer
Incumbent TruePrint™
Edition watermark and copyright line — branding, not a tamper-evident authenticity record
🛡️ India’s Only Anti-Hallucination Legal MCP · BSA 2023 §63 Sealed

1-Click Connect for Claude Desktop, Cursor IDE & Gemini Workspaces

Drafting petitions, counter-affidavits, and written submissions with generic AI models risks fake citations and overruled benches. INSC.ONE provides primary judicial truth through an open MCP endpoint — making your legal drafting fool-proof, court-ready, and cited with 100% confidence.

  • ✓ Zero Hallucination: 100% Extracted word-for-word from signed court records (TrueRatio™).
  • ✓ Larger Bench Overrule Alerts: Automatic Article 141 multi-coram hierarchy audits.
  • ✓ Universal Citation Rosetta: Instant automatic cross-mapping across INSC ⇄ SCC ⇄ AIR ⇄ SCR formats.
  • ✓ Install now on your Claude & Gemini AI tools: 30-second native MCP connection.
View 30-Second MCP Install Guide ➔ Explore JSON-RPC Schema
claude_desktop_config.json ● Live
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "insc": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@insc/mcp-server"]
    }
  }
}
Works instantly in Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, or custom Python / TypeScript AI agent chains.